hey you international protesters: why don´t you sit in an israeli restaurant to protect civilians from bombs? surely you have your reasons, i wouldn´t do as well...

does anyone know where the activists from Brighton in the UK are, and wether they were involved in the protest that was fired on? I have several friends who have gone and am quite worried about their welfare. Any news, especially about Dan, Sukant and Ossama would be very welcome.

As for the activists in general, well done for taking a stand. As others have said, it is an extremely brave action, but please, BE CAREFUL...

NYC, Usual Moday morning,
driving to school,
it's 8:30 US Eastern time,
turned on the radio,
WBAI on default,
as usual...

the show's already on.
live from palestine,
on the cell phone,
some Italian activist,
with hundred more internationals,
joining them palestinians,
in refugee camp (Beit Jalla)
up against a TANK
Israeli Tank,

As he comments,
they are determined
to not let the tank
pass them,

matter a fact,
he says that
they actually
moving forward,

all non-violent,
pacifits with their
arms up,

shot, shot, on more and more

He screams: FUCK!!! NO!! Fuck...

Israeli tank opend fire
on peacefull demonstration.
Soon the contact was lost.

Here in US...
Usual Monday morning,

I kept driving to School...

Whew. I'd advise them to consider bugging out while they can - Israel has nukes, Hezbolla is confirmed to have Bio, also Israeli intelligence has caught several Palestinians crossing from Lebanon with items such as tritium cores, detonator control circuitry, etc that leads them to believe there is a functional nuke or 2 kicking around in the West Bank somewhere.

No, really. Get the hell out now - the sheer number of forces at play here isn't something that can be defused with several hundred 'world citizens'.

Among the wounded are:
- British citizen: Aisa Kiysue, Kunle Ibidun, Chris Dunham
- Australian citizen: Kate Irving (currently being examined to see if
surgery will be required)
- American citizen: Said Khulil

Wounded have been taken to Al Huissen Hospital in Bethlehem.

Yeah right....tritium cores. suicide bombers with conventional bombs blow themselves up upon detection. But these guys with the tritium core didn't detonate a bomb, the just "gave up".
Now that's propaganda!

How are the wounded now? We know Aisa, Kunle and Chris, so are really anxious to know how they are.
Of course, we are also anxious about all the Paleatinians who are suffering so terribly.

To the idiot who asks internationals to protect people in Tel-Aviv: can you really not see thar Israelis are not under occupation, Neither do they have curfews, electricity cuts, roadblocks or tanks in their streets. It must have dawned to the most naive by now that however horrendous suicide bombings are, they are a direct result of the brutal occupation.
Get out of the occupied territories if you want things to calm down! the only problem is that Sharon doesn't want a calm situation; he thrives on violence.
Internationals and Palestinians, we all think of you and admire your forbearance.

Hana Braun...are you any relation to Eva...Hitler's mistress. Haven't you Germans already had a pretty good attempt at trying to annihiliate the Jewish people in the Holocaust. Now it appears, you Germans are trying to aid and abet the Palestiinans in the same purpose today. The agenda of the Palestinians is not a noble cause. They do no seek "freedom" or their "rights". If they did then they would have accepted the very generous offer of statehood made to them by the previous Israel government under Ehud Barak. The Palestinians were offered 97% of westbank, all of gaza, a shared Jerusalem and solution to the refugee issue. This the Palestinians rejected out of hand and in stead launched a terrorist genocidal war of aggression against the Israeli people.

The intifada is not about "occupation". The Palestinians were committing terrorist atrocities well before they could ever allege that land had been "occupied". In 1929, the Palestinians butchered the Jewish population of Hebron. The same thing happened in 1921. The Arabs were committing the same acts of wanton terrorism even before the Israelis established their state in 1948. In 1964, Arafat created the PLO whose avowed aims are the complete destruction of Israel, the insistance that armed violence is the only legitimate means of achieving this aim and that negotiation is invalid. This is in 1964 ie before the six day war of 1967.

The real truth is that the root cause of the Arab Israeli conflict is Palestinian Brutality and Barbaism. Any minor infringements the Palestinians suffer or any loss of land is the direct cause of their refusal to permit a Jewish presence in the region!

By the way, the Westbank area is not "occupied" it is merely "disputed"! The Jews have a very valid claim to live there stretching back into antiquity. The "Westbank" areas of Judea and Samaria represent the cradle of Jewish culture and are littered with Jewish sacred sites and places of veneration. The Arabs simply want to denie this very real Jewish affiliation to the area. The Arabs want to rewrite history by obliterating the Jewish claims to the area. This is why at the start of the Intifada, the Palestinians descrated the sacred site of Joseph's Tomb on the "westbank"

First, your contention that Barak offered the Palestinians 97%of the West Bank, statehood, a solution to the refugee problem, etc. is quite simply ignorant bullshit. I direct you to Political Science Quarterly for an education. You might also try The New York Times, unless that's too radical a newspaper for you. Second, your contention about the Palestinians "butchering" the jews of Hebron in '21, '29, etc. lacks much weight without specific reference to the incidents of which you speak. Be that as it may, if you have more than a token acquaintance to the behavior of both jews and palestinians in the British Mandate, you'd be aware that for every act of palestinian "butchery" there was a similar incident of jewish "butchery". You conveniently fail to mention pre-Israel jewish terrorist organizations such as the Irgun or Stern Gang. Why is that, I wonder? Likewise you fail to mention that Britain's promise to the zionist organizations of a national home in Palestine went directly against the League of Nations Mandate which stated that the wishes of the indigenous population must be taken into account prior to statehood. You also fail to mention that the Zionists were the ones who refused a joint jewish-arab state, that Israel signed a UN agreement in 1949 that mandated resolving the refugee issue with the palestinians and then reneged on it, that the '48 war with the arab nations was a direct result of Ben Gurion's expansionist program for Eretz Israel, that even Israeli leaders of the time admitted that the '56 and '67 wars were total pretexts for continued Israeli expansionism, etc, etc, ad nauseum. In short, your knowledge of the history of the region is spotty, at best. Your contention that the roots of the problem lie in Palestinian brutality are laughable. Your assertion that the Palestinians suffer only "minor" inconveniences unsupportable and motivated by what I can only imagine as a lack of simple humanity. And finally, your assertion that the presence of jews in the land 3000 years ago overides the very real right that the current occupants have to the land suggest that you may, in fact, be completely out of touch with reality.

To boil it down into a simple phrase: You're an idiot.

Israel's State Terrorism

What is the difference between State terrorism and individual terrorist acts? If we understand this difference we'll understand also the evilness of the US policies in the Middle East and the forthcoming disasters. When Yassir Arafat was put under siege in his offices and kept hostage by the Israeli occupation forces, he was constantly pressed into condemning terror and combatting terrorism. Israel's State terrorism is defined by US officials as "self-defense", while individual suicide bombers are called terrorists.

The only "small" difference is that Israeli aggression is the direct responsibility of Ariel Sharon, Benjamin Ben Eliezer, Shimon Peres and Shaul Mofaz, while the individual terrorist acts are done by individuals in despair, usually against Arafat's will. One hour after Arafat declared his support of a cease fire and wished the Jews a Happy Passover feast, a suicide bomber exploded himself in an hotel in Netanya, killing 22 innocent Jews celebrating Passover. Arafat was blamed as responsible for this act, and the present IDF offensive has been justified through this accusation.

At the same time, Sharon's responsibility for Israeli war crimes is being completely ignored. Who should be arrested for the targeted killing of almost 100 Palestinians? Who will be sent to jail for the killing of more than 120 Palestinian paramedics? Who will be sentenced for the killing of more than 1,200 Palestinians and for the collective punishment of more than 3,000,000 civilians during the last 18 months? And who will face the International Tribunal for the illegal settlement of occupied Palestinian Lands, and the disobedience of UN decisions for more than 35 years?

Suicide bombs killing innocent citizens must be unequivocally condemned; they are immoral acts, and their perpetrators should be sent to jail. But they cannot be compared to State terrorism carried out by the Israeli Government. The former are individual acts of despair of a people that sees no future, vastly ignored by an unfair and distorted international public opinion. The latter are cold and "rational" decisions of a State and a military apparatus of occupation, well equipped, financed and backed by the only superpower in the world.

Yet in the public debate, State terrorism and individual suicide bombs are not even considered as comparable cases of terrorism. The State terror and war crimes perpetrated by the Israeli Government are legitimized as "self- defense", while Arafat, even under siege, is demanded to arrest "terrorists".

I want to ask: Who will arrest Sharon, the person directly responsible for the orders to kill Palestinians? When is he going to be defined a terrorist too? How long will the world ignore the Palestinian cry that all they want is freedom and independence? When will it stop neglecting the fact that the goal of the Israeli Government is not security, but the continued occupation and subjugation of the Palestinian people?

As Israelis in the opposition, we are fighting against our government, but the international support that Sharon receives is constantly jeopardizing our struggle. The whole international public opinion must be reverted, and the UN must deploy intervention forces in order to stop the bloodshed and the imminent deterioration. Israelis and Palestinians desperately need the awakening of the international community's public opinion and a reversal in the global attitude. These are needed both in order to save our lives (literally), and preserve our hope in a better future.

Lev Grinberg - Dr. Lev Grinberg is a political sociologist, Director of the Humphrey Institute for Social Research, at Ben Gurion University.

No Brent you are the moron...
Here we see events that occured in just one massacre in 1929 in Safad. We see the same wanton barbaric arab butchering of Jews today in Israeli cafes and shopping centres as was present in 1929 before there was any alleged Palestinian cause..1929 is before the state of Israel was established in 1948.
During the War Years, the Mufti of Jerusalem was the honoured guest of Adolf Hitler. The Mufti helped hitler to plan the genocide of the Jews in Israel.
The Jews have always been on the defensive against Arab attempts to commit genocide on them. Today, the Palestinians may "market" their brutality as being a quest to end "occupation" but really nothing has changed. It is inherent Arab brutality against
David Hacohen reported on the news of the Safad Massacre in 1929:

In the bloody Arab riots of 1921, when Yosef Hayyim Brenner, the distinguished socialist pioneer and author, was among those murdered, I was not in Palestine. . . But in the second half of 1929, where there was a fresh wave of murderous Arab attacks throughout Palestine, from Hebron to Safed, I was back at home...

I believe I was the first Jew to reach Safed from the outside after the massacre there. One Friday morning we heard that there had been a pogrom in Safed. We read the official announcement: "On August 29, at 6:15, disturbances broke out in Safed. The army arrived on the scene at 8:35 and immediately restored order. There were some fatal casualties and many houses were burnt. The Jewish inhabitants were at once transferred to safety. Since then calm has prevailed in Safed."

August 29 was a Thursday. Throughout the day rumors continued to come in that the pogrom in Safed was still going on. But Government House provided us with no further information about events in Safed, which was included in the jurisdiction of the Haifa district commissioner. We had enough experience not to trust the reassuring official announcement...

We set out on Saturday morning. . . I could not believe my eyes. . . I met some of the town's Jewish elders, who fell on my neck weeping bitterly. We went down alleys and steps to the old town. Inside the houses I saw the mutilated and burned bodies of the victims of the massacre, and the burned body of a woman tied to the grille of a window. Going from house to house, I counted ten bodies that had not yet been collected. I saw the destruction and the signs of fire. Even in my grimmest thoughts I had not imagined that this was how I would find Safed where "calm prevailed."

The local Jews gave me a detailed description of how the tragedy had started. The pogrom began on the afternoon of Thursday, August 29, and was carried out by Arabs from Safed and from the nearby villages, armed with weapons and tins of kerosene. Advancing on the street of the Sefardi Jews from Kfar Meron and Ein Zeitim, they looted and set fire to houses, urging each other on to continue with the killing. They slaughtered the schoolteacher, Aphriat, together with his wife and mother, and cut the lawyer, Toledano, to pieces with their knives. Bursting into the orphanages, they smashed the children's heads and cut off their hands. I myself saw the victims. Yitshak Mammon, a native of Safed who lived with an Arab family, was murdered with indescribable brutality: he was stabbed again and again, until his body became a bloody sieve, and then he was trampled to death. Throughout the whole pogrom the police did not fire a single shot. The British police commander, Farradav, walked up and down the main street of the town, where everything was quiet, and did not go down to the scene of the massacre...

The district commissioner defended his own conduct. He said he had known that the situation there was serious, and had therefore demanded that troops be sent in, but they had arrived too late. . . I was unsparing in my criticism of him for not having visited Safed. I said that this showed in the clearest possible way that the government was to blame for what had happened. Riots had been taking place for the past seven days, seven whole days since the Hebron massacre. Incitement to violence in the Safed mosques and provocative stone throwing and threats in the streets had been daily occurrences. The warship and troops had already arrived by then. The looting, destruction, burning, and killing had begun already on Thursday evening and continued all that night and all the next day. Why, then, had the government put out its falsely reassuring announcement?

Instead of protecting the Jewish population and its property, the police commander had evacuated four thousand Jews from their homes to the courtyard of Government House, leaving their homes to be looted and burned. While the looting and killing were still going on, the police were searching the Jews for arms...

My thoughts about the Safed tragedy gave me no peace for a long time. How had such a thing happened? What was the explanation for the terrible loss of Jewish life and property, 18 killed, about 40 wounded, and 200 houses burned and looted?

The Hebron Massacre of 1929
by Shira Schoenberg

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For some time, the 800 Jews in Hebron lived in peace with their tens of thousands of Arab neighbors. But on the night of August 23, 1929, the tension simmering within this cauldron of nationalities bubbled over, and for 3 days, Hebron turned into a city of terror and murder. By the time the massacres ended, 67 Jews lay dead and the survivors were relocated to Jerusalem, leaving Hebron barren of Jews for the first time in hundreds of years.

The summer of 1929 was one of unrest in Palestine. Jewish-Arab tensions were spurred on by the agitation of the mufti in Jerusalem. Just one day prior to the start of the Hebron massacre, three Jews and three Arabs were killed in Jerusalem when fighting broke out after a Muslim prayer service on the Temple Mount. Arabs spread false rumors throughout their communities, saying that Jews were carrying out "wholesale killings of Arabs." Meanwhile, Jewish immigrants were arriving in Palestine in increasing numbers, further exacerbating the Jewish-Arab conflict.

Hebron had, until this time, been outwardly peaceful, although tension hid below the surface. The Sephardi Jewish community in Hebron had lived quietly with its Arab neighbors for centuries. The Sephardi Jews (Jews who were originally from Spain, North Africa and Arab countries) spoke Arabic and had a cultural connection to their Arab neighbors. In the mid-1800s, Ashkenazi (native European) Jews started moving to Hebron and, in 1925, the Slobodka Yeshiva, officially the Yeshiva of Hevron, Knesset Yisrael-Slobodka, was opened. Yeshiva students lived separately from the Sephardi community, and from the Arab population. Due to this isolation, the Arabs viewed them with suspicion and hatred, and identified them as Zionist immigrants. Despite the general suspicion, however, one yeshiva student, Dov Cohen, still recalled being on "very good" terms with the Arab neighbors. He remembered yeshiva boys taking long walks late at night on the outskirts of the city, and not feeling afraid, even though only one British policeman guarded the entire city.

On Friday, August 23, 1929, that tranquility was lost. Arab youths started throwing rocks at the yeshiva students. That afternoon, one student, Shmuel Rosenholtz, went to the yeshiva alone. Arab rioters later broke in and killed him, and that was only the beginning.

Friday night, Rabbi Ya’acov Slonim’s son invited any fearful Jews to stay in his house. The rabbi was highly regarded in the community, and he had a gun. Many Jews took him up on this offer, and many Jews were eventually murdered there.

As early as 8:00 a.m. on Saturday, the Jewish Sabbath, Arabs began to gather en masse. They came in mobs, armed with clubs, knives and axes. While the women and children threw stones, the men ransacked Jewish houses and destroyed Jewish property. With only a single police officer in Hebron, the Arabs entered Jewish courtyards with no opposition.

Rabbi Slonim, who had tried to shelter the Jewish population, was approached by the rioters and offered a deal. If all the Ashkenazi yeshiva students were given over to the Arabs, the rioters would spare the lives of the Sephardi community. Rabbi Slonim refused to turn over the students and was killed on the spot. In the end, 12 Sephardi Jews and 55 Ashkenazi Jews were murdered.

A few Arabs did try to help the Jews. Nineteen Arab families saved dozens, maybe even hundreds of Jews. Zmira Mani wrote about an Arab named Abu Id Zaitoun who brought his brother and son to rescue her and her family. The Arab family protected the Manis with their swords, hid them in a cellar along with other Jews who they had saved, and found a policeman to escort them safely to the police station at Beit Romano.

The police station turned into a shelter for the Jews that morning of August 24. It also became a synagogue as the Orthodox Jews gathered there and said their morning prayers. As they finished praying, they began to hear noises outside the building. Thousands of Arabs descended from Har Hebron, shouting "Kill the Jews!" in Arabic. They even tried to break down the doors of the station.

The Jews were besieged in Beit Romano for three days. Each night, ten men were allowed to leave to attend a funeral in Hebron’s ancient Jewish cemetery for the murdered Jews of the day.

When the massacre finally ended, the surviving Jews were forced to leave their home city and resettled in Jerusalem. Some Jewish families tried to move back to Hebron, but were removed by the British authorities in 1936 at the start of the Arab revolt. In 1948, the War of Independence granted Israel statehood, but further cut the Jews off from Hebron, a city that was captured by King Abdullah's Arab Legion and ultimately annexed to Jordan.

When Jews finally gained control of the city in 1967, a small number of massacre survivors again tried to reclaim their old houses. Then defense minister Moshe Dayan supposedly told the survivors that if they returned, they would be arrested, and that they should be patient while the government worked out a solution to get their houses back. Years later, settlers moved to parts of Hebron without the permission of the government, but for those massacre survivors still seeking their original homes, that solution never came.

Your command of the history under the British Mandate seems spotty. Or perhaps it's just that you're selective in what you choose to highlight. No matter. I don't intend to make a double post "refuting" your allegations that today's violence is a result of "inherent" arab brutality. I'll simply say that, as noted before, you conveniently leave out much objective history in order to support your notion. When placed in the context of rival nationalist movements, the violence between arabs and jews in the Mandate doesn't appear to be so mysterious, or so "inherently" arab-instigated. Even as early as the 1921 Jaffa riots the zionist and British leaders had already recognized that the creation of a jewish state required the expulsion of the majority of arabs from their land. Who could be so deluded as to think that such a plan would not lead to violence? Jewish "revenge" for arab violence was as horrific as that attributed to arabs. There was the same looting, the same murdering of women and children, the same complicity of members of the police force (this time jewish policemen). When one delves into the history of the current situation, one always comes back to the simple fact that the zionists wanted to acquire land, and the arabs refused to give the land up.

Were the jews in Palestine helpless and innocent victims? Some of them, surely. But there were as many jewish agitators as arab agitators at the time. For instance, shortly before the Hebron massacre (an event generated by arab fear that the Zionists would acquire the temple mount and rebuild the Temple, coupled with a fear that the Zionists would dispossess the arabs of their entire country) Chaim Shalom Halevie wrote home to his parents, "[the arabs] hate us and they are right, because we hate them too, hate them with a deadly hatred." He insisted that the truth behind the Zionist movement's nice language and goodwill was an inherent hatred jews harbored for arabs. Realizing the Zionist dream would lead to pushing the arabs out of the country, and one day "Nothing will be left of them." Nor was this all he had to say on the matter. "We should rebel against the Zionist Executive and the National Council, we should come out against them and defy their order to hold back. We should shout and make the earth shake..."

And of "inherent" arab brutality? Most of Hebron's jews were saved because arabs hid them in their homes. Over two-thirds of the community found refuge with arab families, some of whgom took in dozens of jews. "arabs were hurt defending their neighbors," one jew testified afterward.

When one looks at the attitude of the Zionist organizations toward the national aspirations of the indigenous arabs of Palestine under the British Mandate, what one finds is a contempt that borders on racist. That attitude, coupled with a complete unwillingness on the part of those oragnizations to settle for anything less than complete control of what would become Israel, at the expense of the majority arab population, explains a lot about how the situation has evolved into the current mess.

You seem interested in the horrific details of massacres. Perhaps at some future date you will fiund the time to post details of Deir Yassin, Kibya, Kafr Kassem, Sabra and Shatila, etc. After all, we should have equal opportunity to have our hearts moved by the atrocities committed against arabs as by those committed BY them.

Your contention that the Mufti of Jerusalem helped plan the Holocaust is interesting. Perhaps you could cite a reference? In the meantime, given your contention that the arabs were complicit in Hitler's genocide of the jews, perhaps you can explain why the arabs fought on the side of the british against german forces? And why jewish groups fought against the british during wartime? (Here I refer specifically to terrorist acts carried out by the Irgun and Stern Gang: the assassination of Lord Moyne, the bombing of the King David Hotel, etc.)

When the context which you left out is presented, it becomes quite obvious that violence between the arabs and jews has its roots in the jewish expulsion of arabs from their own country. As long as the issue of palestinian self-determination remains unresolved, it's likely that there will continue to be horrible acts of violence and bloodshed instigated by both sides in this equation. The facile reliance on "inherent arab brutality" as an excuse is simply insufficient historically, morally, or politically. But what do you care, right? As long as you can maintain your cherished bias.

For anyone else interested in an actual historical investigation of PPalestine under the British Mandate, I suggest picking up Tom Segev's One Palestine, Complete: Jews and Arabs unter the British Mandate.

Do not assume that the previous respondent was not in fact Jewish. In fact, there are many, and growing, thousands of Jews like Ms Braun and myself who are saying, 'not in my name.' We are completely devastated by Sharon's regime. The history of attack and reprisal goes back to the 30s (vix. Irgun, Stern, King David, razing scores of Arab villages...). It can't be reduced to solely focussing on the current suicide bombings. If we don't understand the (full) history we are doomed to repeat it...

the only answer is a non violent permanent revolt of the *whole* citizens: should they be jews, arabs or europeans. the evil game we are facing now is the warlords' one. we are all victims!!!
the only logical response is a non violent constant campaign thus to give hope and a proper development possibility to everyone!!!

no justice - no peace !!!

The biggest mistake the allies made in World War 2 was stopping Hitler before he finished a good job of exterminating the bloody Jews.

They have been a total pain in the arse all the way down through history. They cause problems and when someone hits back at them they scream and whine about how terribly they are being treated. They constantly barrage us with the Holocaust crap to the point that no sane person wants to watch TV or hear about it when it is on. Most of it is fabrication in any case as is most Jewish propaganda. Goebels had willing pupils in the beanie wearing crowd. The Jews were not the only people in the concentration camps by a long shot. Many innocent but dissenting (non Jewish) Germans were also there and I have met and spoken with many non Jew survivors personally. They tell a far different story.

Many countries had the sense to kick the Jews out. Now the western hemisphere, US (Now the 4th Reich), Canada (to its shame) and many others are all basically Jew controlled. The US can't do anything without Jew (Israeli) permission. Our press and majority of the media are Jew controlled so that we never hear of the Jewish, Nazi type atrocities. (Thank God or whoever for the Internet). A large number of the Bush administration are Jews and major criminals including Rummsfelt who it is reported heads Murder Incorporated out of Chicago. There isn't a prayer in hell that the US can ever be seen by the Palestinians as an honest broker in trying to settle the matter as they are so tied to the Jew apron strings that they can never be unprejudiced.

In Canada our media is virtually controlled (90%) by one Jew, Izzy Asper, the largest bagman for the Liberal (so called government). He recently sent a memo to his empire that no anti Israeli news was to be reported. How's that for one jerk censorship. The staff of one Montreal paper apparently objected but nothing was ever mentioned in the Jew controlled media.

I strongly support the Palestinians. I remember, most people seem to have forgotten or never knew, the days after WW2 when the Jewish terrorists were sneaking into Palestine and killing the Palestinian Policemen. Many of their "leaders" have been and still are, terrorists. The sooner Sharon and similar thinking are exterminated as the vermin they are the better and the entire Bush family as well. ALL terrorists.

I will close with a blessing.

May the excrement from Johnathan Livingston Seagul and his world wide associates descend upon all Jews, Israel and Israeli sympathizers simultaneously from a great height for ever and a day. May they never know peace, happiness, or any form of success, but instead. constant pain, suffering and harassment again, for ever and a day.

Finally. Please, Powers that Be, may peace, love, happiness, success, prosperity and wealth be with the Palestinians for ever and a day and may they never again be cursed with the filth of the Jew.
Blessed Be, Blessed Be, Blessed Be.

Gee, what brings these pustulanious ass holes to Indymedia? I can't imagine, what? I mean we're oral right? And we're clean, right? So. let's just ignore that:

1) Nazis are really drawn ot our website

2) Arabs and Nazis were part of the "Axis" in the 2nd World War

3) that martin Luther King pointed out that anti-zionist was a code for anti semite.

So, here we are. Our funky sexuality intact. Our gender issues under control and our noserings in place. We're so sure of ourselves. Losers!

What you did for the world today fuck face?
Ah yes, armchair intifada.
Come HERE to the middle east, to Israel,
to Palestine, and SEE if you got REAL balls.
Not likely, right.
Why don't you shut up you FAT WASP face.